Unit 5 of 5
Study guide for DSST DSST Money and Banking — Unit 5: International Finance. Practice questions, key concepts, and exam tips.
16
Practice Questions
10
Flashcards
6
Key Topics
Try these 5 questions from this unit. Sign up for full access to all 16.
A student researching international finance observes that the U.S. dollar has strengthened significantly against the Mexican peso over the past year. The student notes that American exports to Mexico have declined while Mexican imports to the United States have increased. Which of the following best explains this trade pattern?
Answer: D — The correct answer (D) demonstrates understanding of how exchange rates affect international trade flows. When the dollar strengthens, American exports become more expensive in foreign currency terms, reducing demand, while imports become relatively cheaper, increasing demand. This explains both phenomena mentioned. Option A identifies only half the mechanism (export decline) and misses the import increase component. Option B confuses currency strength with economic weakness—a strong currency can reflect strong economic fundamentals. Option C represents an extreme misconception that exchange rate changes eliminate trade entirely rather than shifting patterns. The question tests application by requiring students to connect currency movement to real trade consequences.
A U.S. manufacturing company needs to pay a Japanese supplier ¥50 million for imported components. The company's finance manager is evaluating different payment methods: (1) converting dollars to yen immediately at the current spot rate, (2) using a forward contract to lock in an exchange rate 90 days from now, (3) holding dollars and converting only when payment is due, or (4) asking the supplier to accept payment in dollars instead. Which approach best protects the company from exchange rate risk while maintaining cost certainty for budgeting purposes?
Answer: B — The forward contract (option B) is correct because it achieves two critical objectives: (1) it hedges exchange rate risk by locking in a predetermined exchange rate for a future date, and (2) it allows the company to know with certainty what the payment will cost in dollars for budgeting and financial planning purposes. This is the standard tool for managing transaction exposure in international finance. Option A is incorrect because spot rates change constantly—locking in immediately may not be optimal and doesn't align with the actual payment timeline. Option C represents speculation rather than risk management; delaying conversion exposes the company to currency fluctuations that could increase costs significantly. Option D is a misconception that oversimplifies international transactions—most suppliers require payment in their home currency, and requesting an alternative creates negotiating complications while potentially increasing the supplier's costs (which they may pass along to the buyer).
A U.S. manufacturing company exports automotive parts to Japan. Recently, the U.S. dollar has strengthened significantly against the Japanese yen. The company's marketing manager is concerned about the impact on sales. Which of the following best explains why the company should be concerned and what is most likely to occur?
Answer: C — The correct answer (C) demonstrates full understanding by identifying both the mechanism (stronger dollar increases foreign currency price) and the realistic economic consequence (reduced sales volume with a reasonable caveat about price elasticity). Option A represents a fundamental misconception about exchange rate effects—students often reverse the relationship, incorrectly thinking stronger domestic currency helps exporters. Option B is partially correct in identifying the price effect but omits the important qualifier that elasticity of demand matters; a company selling specialized parts with inelastic demand might maintain sales despite higher prices. Option D incorrectly dismisses exchange rates entirely and overstates the role of interest rates, reflecting a misunderstanding of how exchange rate transmission works in international trade. This question tests the ability to apply exchange rate concepts to real business scenarios and recognize the multi-factor nature of export competitiveness.
A researcher analyzing currency markets observes that the U.S. dollar has appreciated significantly against the euro over the past six months, despite the U.S. Federal Reserve maintaining relatively stable interest rates. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank has begun an aggressive monetary easing campaign. The researcher notes that U.S. Treasury yields remain higher than German bond yields, and U.S. stock markets have outperformed European markets substantially. Which of the following best explains the dollar's appreciation in this scenario?
Answer: D — The correct answer (D) demonstrates comprehensive understanding that exchange rates result from multiple interconnected factors—monetary policy divergence, interest rate differentials, and relative asset performance—all working together to influence international capital flows and currency demand. Option A is incorrect because it explicitly contradicts the stimulus (the Fed maintained stable rates, not tight policy), representing the misconception that currency appreciation requires active tightening. Option B reflects a common misunderstanding that trade balances mechanically determine exchange rates; trade flows are less significant than capital flows in modern flexible exchange rate systems. Option C correctly identifies the primary mechanism (capital flows driven by yield differentials) but omits the reinforcing effects of interest rate differentials and equity market outperformance, demonstrating incomplete analysis. Answer D is superior because it integrates all observable market conditions—ECB easing, U.S. Treasury yield advantage, and equity market divergence—into a coherent explanation of how rational capital allocation decisions strengthen dollar demand. This tests the ability to synthesize multiple international finance concepts rather than apply a single mechanical rule.
A U.S. manufacturing company exports $2 million worth of goods to Japan and expects payment in Japanese yen in 90 days. The current exchange rate is 110 yen per dollar. The company's CFO is concerned about potential yen depreciation over the next three months, which would reduce the dollar value of the payment when converted. Which strategy best addresses this currency risk while allowing the company to benefit from favorable exchange rate movements?
Answer: A — A forward contract is the optimal hedging instrument here because it directly addresses the stated concern (yen depreciation risk) by locking in a known exchange rate, ensuring predictable cash flows for business planning. This is a core international finance principle: matching the hedging tool to the specific exposure. Why B is incorrect: Immediate conversion eliminates the foreign exchange exposure entirely, but it's operationally inefficient—the company hasn't received the yen yet and would need to borrow or use cash reserves. More importantly, it eliminates ALL upside potential, not just downside protection. Why C is incorrect: This is passive speculation rather than risk management. Waiting exposes the company to depreciation risk, which directly contradicts the CFO's expressed concern. This approach fails the fiduciary duty to protect shareholder value from preventable losses. Why D is incorrect: While put options do provide downside protection AND upside potential, they are more expensive than forward contracts (they require premium payments) and create complexity. For a straightforward 90-day transaction with known payment timing, a forward contract is the market-standard, cost-effective solution. Options are better suited for uncertain future exposures.
DSST® is a trademark owned by Prometric, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this product.